|
| This article is part of the supplement: Innovative Rheumatology: Gene and Cell Therapies of Arthritis and Related Autoimmune Disorders. Second International MeetingMeeting abstractViral gene transfer for bone healingOrthopädische Klinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany from Innovative Rheumatology: Gene and Cell Therapies of Arthritis and Related Autoimmune Disorders. Second International Meeting Arthritis Res 2001, 3(Suppl 1):P4doi:10.1186/ar367
© 2001 BioMed Central Ltd ObjectivesLocal gene transfer to bone and adjacent tissues offers promise in cases of bone healing disorders such as segmental bone defects, non-unions, and aseptic loosening of endoprotheses. Method and resultsStudies in which osteoinductive genes have been administered therapeutically are predominantly segmental defect models in rabbits and rats. One additional study has been performed to prevent bone loss in mice. The administration of different marker genes to segmental defects induced transient gene expression locally for up to 6 weeks. β-galactosidase expression was seen after injection of adenoviral vectors encoding the LacZ gene within the callus tissue, the bony ends adjacent to the cuts, and the surrounding muscle. After injection of Ad-luciferase gene expression was also found predominantly locally, and besides that very low expression in the liver for up to 5 days, whereas local expression within bone lasted up to 6, within the surrounding soft tissues up to 3 weeks. No transgene expression was seen in the contralateral limb, lung, or spleen. Injection of adenoviral vectors carrying BMP-2 cDNA led to healing of the segmental defects after 8–12 weeks, the untreated control defects did not heal. Vectors encoding the transforming growth factor-β1 gene increased matrix formation within the defects, but resulted not in complete mineralization of the newly formed callus as seen after transduction with the BMP-2 cDNA. The results were judged by radiographic, histologic, histomorphologic, and biomechanical criteria. ConclusionThe data encourage the further development of genetic approaches to enhancing bone formation in cases of bone disorders. Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |



on Google Scholar




