<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>ar2873</ui><ji>ARJ</ji><fm>
<dochead>Research article</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>Total cholesterol and triglycerides are associated with the development of new bone marrow lesions in asymptomatic middle-aged women - a prospective cohort study</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au id="A1"><snm>Davies-Tuck</snm><mi>L</mi><fnm>Miranda</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>miranda.davies@med.monash.edu.au</email></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>Hanna</snm><fnm>Fahad</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I2"/><insr iid="I3"/><email>fahad.hanna@med.monash.edu.au</email></au>
<au id="A3"><snm>Davis</snm><mi>R</mi><fnm>Susan</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>Susan.Davis@med.monash.edu.au</email></au>
<au id="A4"><snm>Bell</snm><mi>J</mi><fnm>Robin</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>robin.bell@med.monash.edu.au</email></au>
<au id="A5"><snm>Davison</snm><mi>L</mi><fnm>Sonia</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>Sonia.Davison@med.monash.edu.au</email></au>
<au id="A6"><snm>Wluka</snm><mi>E</mi><fnm>Anita</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I2"/><email>anita.wluka@med.monash.edu.au</email></au>
<au id="A7"><snm>Adams</snm><fnm>Jenny</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>Jenny.Adams@med.monash.edu.au</email></au>
<au ca="yes" id="A8"><snm>Cicuttini</snm><mi>M</mi><fnm>Flavia</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>Flavia.cicuttini@med.monash.edu.au</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Medical School, Alfred Hospital, 89 Commercial Road, Prahran, Victoria 3004, Australia</p></ins>
<ins id="I2"><p>Baker Heart Research Institute, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia</p></ins>
<ins id="I3"><p>The Women's Health Program, Department of Medicine, Monash University Medical School, Alfred Hospital, 89 Commercial Road, Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>Arthritis Research &amp; Therapy</source>
<issn>1478-6354</issn>
<pubdate>2009</pubdate>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>R181</fpage>
<url>http://arthritis-research.com/content/11/6/R181</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/ar2873</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">19961577</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
</bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>14</day><month>4</month><year>2009</year></date></rec><revreq><date><day>8</day><month>6</month><year>2009</year></date></revreq><revrec><date><day>14</day><month>10</month><year>2009</year></date></revrec><acc><date><day>4</day><month>12</month><year>2009</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>4</day><month>12</month><year>2009</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2009</year><collab>Davies-Tuck et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<abs>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abstract</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Introduction</p>
</st>
<p>Given the emerging evidence that osteoarthritis (OA) may have a vascular basis, the aim of this study was to determine whether serum lipids were associated with change in knee cartilage, presence of bone marrow lesions (BMLs) at baseline and the development of new BMLs over a 2-year period in a population of pain-free women in mid-life.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<p>One hundred forty-eight women 40 to 67 years old underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of their dominant knee at baseline and 2.2 (standard deviation 0.12) years later. Cartilage volume and BMLs were determined for both time points. Serum lipids were measured from a single-morning fasting blood test approximately 1.5 years prior to the MRI.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<p>The incidence of BML at follow-up was associated with higher levels of total cholesterol (odds ratio [OR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01, 3.36; <it>P </it>= 0.048) and triglycerides (OR 8.4, 95% CI 1.63, 43.43; <it>P </it>= 0.01), but not high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (<it>P </it>= 0.93), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (<it>P </it>= 0.20) or total cholesterol/HDL ratio (<it>P </it>= 0.17). No association between total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL or total cholesterol/HDL ratio and presence of BMLs at baseline or annual change in total tibial cartilage volume was observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusions</p>
</st>
<p>In this study of asymptomatic middle-aged women with no clinical knee OA, serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels were associated with the incidence of BMLs over 2 years. This provides support for the hypothesis that vascular pathology may have a role in the pathogenesis of knee OA. Further work is warranted to clarify this and whether treatments aimed at reducing serum lipids may have a role in reducing the burden of knee OA.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm><meta>
<classifications>
<classification id="endnote" subtype="user_supplied_xml" type="bmc"/>
</classifications>
</meta><bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Introduction</p>
</st>
<p>The prevalence of vascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors is high amongst people with osteoarthritis (OA) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Emerging evidence suggests that these conditions may share risk factors <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia, both risk factors for cardiovascular disease, have been related to risk of OA and the progression of OA in epidemiologic studies <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>There are a number of mechanisms by which vascular pathology may contribute to the development of OA. The ends of bones are particularly susceptible to vascular insult <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Venous occlusion resulting in small-vessel stasis underlying the cartilage plate, joint hypertension, hypercoagulability and/or microemboli may all result in subchondral bone ischemia <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The resulting disturbances to subchondral bone nutrition and repair may impair the supply of nutrients and oxygen to the overlying cartilage plate <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Bone ischemia may also result in osteocyte death, leading to bone resorption, which may reduce the strength of the bony foundation of articular cartilage <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>With the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it is now possible to directly visualise joint structures, including cartilage and bone, in healthy subjects prior to the onset of OA. While cartilage loss is considered the hallmark of OA and is associated with symptoms <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and risk of joint replacement <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, there is increasing evidence for a significant role of bone in the pathogenesis of knee OA and it has been suggested that bone changes may predate cartilage changes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) are associated with knee pain <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and structural changes in the knee in subjects with or without pain or radiographic OA or both. These include increased joint space narrowing <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, loss of cartilage <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and cartilage defects <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. BMLs are common in those with OA, are predominantly associated with malalignment and, once present, are unlikely to resolve <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In contrast, in asymptomatic populations <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, their presence is also associated with systemic factors such as dietary lipids <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and they are more likely to resolve <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. This is perhaps not surprising given that the histology of BML is heterogeneous and includes osteonecrosis, oedema, trabecular abnormalities and bony remodeling <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and more recently evidence of ischemia or reperfusion injury or both <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Given the emerging evidence that OA may have a vascular basis, the aim of this study was to explore the relationship between serum lipids and (a) baseline prevalence of BMLs and (b) annual change in knee cartilage and incidence of BMLs over a 2-year period in a population of pain-free middle-aged women.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Materials and methods</p>
</st>
<p>One hundred seventy-six women, 40 to 67 years old, were recruited from an existing cross-sectional study examining knee structure in women <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. These women were initially recruited from a database established from the electoral roll in Victoria, Australia, between April 2002 and August 2003 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Women were excluded if they had OA as defined by the American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, current or past knee disease, a history in the past 5 years of knee pain lasting for more than 24 hours, a previous knee injury requiring non-weight-bearing treatment for more than 24 hours or surgery (including arthroscopy) or a history of any arthritis diagnosed by a medical practitioner or contraindication to MRI. The study was approved by the Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee, and all participants gave written informed consent.</p>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Anthropometric data and smoking status</p>
</st>
<p>The height and weight of each participant were measured at the time of the original study (2003 to 2005). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from these data as weight (in kilograms) divided by height squared (in metres squared). Smoking status was determined by questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Measurement of blood lipids</p>
</st>
<p>Each participant took part in a single-morning fasting blood test at the time of the original study (2002 to 2003) approximately 1.53 years (standard deviation [SD] 0.24 years) prior to their first knee MRI. Fasting bloods drawn at the time of recruitment were stored at -80&#176;C until assayed. Total cholesterol was determined by the CHOD-PAP (cholesterol oxidase phenol 4-aminoantipyrine peroxidase) method and triglycerides by the GPO-PAP (glycerol phosphate oxidase-p-aminophenazone) method using a Hitachi 747 analyser (Boehringer Mannheim Systems, now part of Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was measured by an enzymatic colorimetric test on a Hitachi 747 analyser. The assay range is 0.1 to 20 mg/L with intra-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) of 1.34% at 0.55 mg/L and 0.28% at 12.36 mg/L, interassay CVs of 5.7% at 0.52 mg/L and 2.5% at 10.98 mg/L and a detection limit of 0.03 mg/L <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was calculated according to a method previously described <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Magnetic resonance imaging and the measurement of cartilage volume and bone marrow lesion</p>
</st>
<p>An MRI of each woman's dominant knee (defined as the lower limb from which the subject stepped off from when initiating gait) was performed between October 2003 and August 2004 and approximately 2 years later <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Knees were imaged in the sagittal plane on a 1.5-T whole-body magnetic resonance unit (Philips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) using a commercial transmit-receive extremity coil. The following sequence and parameters were used: fat-saturated, gradient echo, three-dimensional, T1-weighted (8 ms/12 ms/55 degrees, repetition time/echo time/flip angle, slice thickness of 1.5 mm, field of view of 16 cm and matrix of 513 &#215; 196 pixels). In addition, a coronal, T2-weighted, fat-saturated acquisition (repetition time of 2,200 ms, echo time of 20/80 ms, slice thickness of 3 mm, 0.3 interslice gap, one excitation, field of view of 11 to 12 cm and matrix of 256 &#215; 128 pixels) was obtained.</p>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Assessment of bone marrow lesions</p>
</st>
<p>BMLs were defined as areas of increased signal intensity adjacent to subcortical bone present in either the medial or lateral side of the distal femur or proximal tibia assessed from coronal, T2-weighted, fat-saturated images <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Two trained observers, who were blinded to patient characteristics as well as the sequence of images, together assessed the presence of lesions for each subject. The presence or absence of a BML was determined. The reproducibility for determination of the BML was assessed using 60 randomly selected knee MRI scans (&#954; value 0.88, <it>P </it>&lt; 0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Cartilage volume measurement</p>
</st>
<p>The volumes of the individual cartilage plates (medial and lateral tibial) were measured by two blinded assessors from the total volume by manually drawing disarticulation contours around the cartilage boundaries on each section on a workstation, as previously described <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, at baseline and approximately 2 years later. The CVs for the medial and lateral cartilage volume measures were 3.4% and 2.0%, respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Statistical methods</p>
</st>
<p>Variables were assessed for normality. Age, BMI, total cholesterol, total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio and annual change in cartilage volume were all normally distributed; baseline presence and developing an incident BML compared with 'not' were binary variables. Annual change in tibial cartilage volume was calculated by subtracting the follow-up volume from the baseline volume and then dividing it by the time between MRI scans. Serum levels of triglyceride, HDL-C and LDL-C were not normally distributed and therefore the natural logarithms (ln) were used. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds of having a prevalent BML at baseline or an 'incident' BML at follow-up for each of the lipids measured. The potential confounders of age and BMI were included in the multivariate model. Linear regression was used to determine the relationship between lipids and annual change in cartilage volume. A <it>P </it>value of less than 0.05 (two-tailed) was regarded as statistically significant. All analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical package (version 15.0.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<p>One hundred and forty-eight (84%) of the 176 eligible women completed the 2 year follow up. Apart from being younger (<it>P</it> = 0.04) there were no significant differences in BMI (<it>P</it> = 0.31), total cholesterol (<it>P</it> = 0.85), (ln)triglycerides (<it>P</it> = 0.82), (ln)LDL (<it>P</it> = 0.38), (ln)HDL (<it>P</it> = 0.72) and total cholesterol/HDL ratio (<it>P</it> = 0.45) between those who completed the follow up and those who did not. Twenty-two (15%) of the population had a BML present in their knee at baseline. One-hundred twenty-six women were BML-free at baseline. Of them, 11 (9%) developed an incident BML over the 2-year follow-up. A comparison of baseline characteristics of the 126 women (115 who did not develop a BML and 11 who did) is presented in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>.</p>
<tbl hint_layout="double" id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>Baseline characteristics of study subjects who did not develop an incident bone marrow lesion compared with those who did</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>No incident BML</b>
            </p>
            <p>
               <b>n = 115</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Incident BML</b>
            </p>
            <p>
               <b>n = 11</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Age, years</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>52.3 (6.80)<sup>a</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>54.7 (4.98)<sup>a</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.31<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Body mass index, kg/m<sup>2</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>26.9 (5.42)<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>28.9 (5.14)<sup>a</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.23<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Total cholesterol, mmol/L<sup>c</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5.71 (3.7-8.3)<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6.45 (4.8-9.1)<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.04<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Triglycerides, mmol/L<sup>d</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.0 (0.5-2.9)<sup>e</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.4 (0.8-3.8)<sup>e</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01<sup>f</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>HDL, mmol/L<sup>c</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.5 (0.5-2.6)<sup>e</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.3 (0.9-2.6)<sup>e</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.52<sup>f</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>LDL, mmol/L<sup>c</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.6 (1.8-5.8)<sup>e</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.87 (3.2-6.3)<sup>e</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.19<sup>f</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Total/HDL ratio</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.8 (2.0-7.4)<sup>a</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5.3 (2.5-8.3)<sup>a</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.13<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p><sup>a</sup>Mean (standard deviation or range). <sup>b</sup>Independent samples <it>t </it>test. <sup>c</sup>To convert from mmol/L to mg/dL, divide by 0.0259. <sup>d</sup>To convert from mmol/L to mg/dL, divide by 0.0113. <sup>e</sup>Median (range). <sup>f</sup>Mann-Whitney <it>U </it>test. BML, bone marrow lesion; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>Serum lipids were not found to be significantly associated with the presence of BMLs at baseline (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). The relationships between serum lipids and incidence of BMLs are presented in Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>. Incident BMLs were associated with higher total cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations but not HDL-C, LDL-C or total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio. Only one woman who developed a BML had ever smoked, so the relationship between smoking and incident BML could not be examined. The odds of developing a BML were 1.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01, 3.36) for every 1 mmol/L increase in total cholesterol after adjusting for the potential confounders of age and BMI (<it>P </it>= 0.048). The odds of an incident BML were 8.4 (95% CI 1.63, 43.43) for each unit increase in (ln)triglycerides after adjusting for confounders (<it>P </it>= 0.01). A trend between increased odds of incident BMLs and total cholesterol/HDL-C was also observed (odds ratio [OR] 1.53, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.38; <it>P </it>= 0.06) in univariate analyses, but this relationship did not reach significance after adjustment for confounders (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.32; <it>P </it>= 0.17). All analyses were also performed adjusting for weight rather than BMI, but this did not alter the results (data not shown).</p>
<tbl hint_layout="double" id="T2"><title><p>Table 2</p></title><caption><p>Association between bone marrow lesions at baseline and lipids</p></caption><tblbdy cols="5">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Univariate analysis, odds ratio</b>
            </p>
            <p>
               <b>(95% CI)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Multivariate analysis, odds ratio</b>
            </p>
            <p>
               <b>(95% CI)<sup>a</sup></b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="5">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Total cholesterol</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.91 (0.62, 1.33)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.63</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.9 (0.6,1.35)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.61</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Ln triglycerides</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.99 (0.77, 5.16)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.15</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.81 (0.63, 5.20)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.27</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Ln HDL</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.45 (0.09, 2.12)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.31</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.63 (0.11, 3.50)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.6</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Ln LDL</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.65 (0.15, 2.90)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.58</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.58 (0.12, 2.80)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.50</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Total/HDL ratio</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.10 (0.81, 1.50)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.54</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.03 (0.73, 1.43)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.88</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p><sup>a</sup>Odds ratio of having a bone marrow lesion present at baseline for each unit increase in total cholesterol, natural logarithm (Ln) of triglycerides, natural logarithm of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or for the total/HDL ration after adjusting for age and body mass index. CI, confidence interval.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<tbl hint_layout="double" id="T3"><title><p>Table 3</p></title><caption><p>Association between incident bone marrow lesions and lipids</p></caption><tblbdy cols="5">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Univariate analysis, odds ratio</b>
            </p>
            <p>
               <b>(95% CI)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Multivariate analysis, odds ratio</b>
            </p>
            <p>
               <b>(95% CI)<sup>a</sup></b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="5">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Total cholesterol</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.82 (1.04, 3.2)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.037</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.84 (1.01, 3.36)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.048</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Ln triglycerides</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>9.23 (2.06, 41.46)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8.4 (1.63, 43.43)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Ln HDL</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.60 (0.06, 5.99)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.67</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.12 (0.008, 14.79)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.93</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Ln LDL</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.10 (0.56, 89.39)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.13</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5.79 (0.39,86.46)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.20</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Total/HDL ratio</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.53 (0.98, 2.38)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.06</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.41 (0.86, 2.32)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.17</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p><sup>a</sup>Odds ratio of having an incident bone marrow lesion for each unit increase in total cholesterol, natural logarithm (Ln) of triglycerides, natural logarithm of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or for the total/HDL ration after adjusting for age and body mass index. CI, confidence interval.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>In addition, when all people who had a BML at either baseline or follow-up (n = 33) were grouped and compared with those who had never had a BML (n = 115), we found that the difference in BMI between the two groups approached significance with a trend of <it>P </it>= 0.09 (BML group: mean 28.8 mmol/L, SD 6.3; no BML group: mean 26.9 mmol/L, SD 5.4), but there was no difference in age or gender. Triglyceride levels were also significantly higher in those with a BML compared with those who did not have a BML at either time point (median 1.3 mmol/L, range 0.7 to 3.8, compared with median 1.0 mmol/L, range 0.5 to 2.9; <it>P </it>= 0.02). This persisted after adjusting for age and BMI (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.16 to 9.21; <it>P </it>= 0.024).</p>
<p>No association between total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C, LDL-C, total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio and smoking status and annual change in total tibial cartilage volume was observed (Table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>). Similarly, when the medial and lateral compartments were analysed separately, no association was seen (data not shown).</p>
<tbl hint_layout="double" id="T4"><title><p>Table 4</p></title><caption><p>Association between lipids and annual change in total tibial cartilage volume</p></caption><tblbdy cols="5">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Univariate analysis, regression coefficient</b>
            </p>
            <p>
               <b>(95% CI)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Multivariate analysis, regression coefficient</b>
            </p>
            <p>
               <b>(95% CI)<sup>a</sup></b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="5">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Total cholesterol</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-0.24 (-12.77, 12.28)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.97</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-1.77 (-11.35, 14.88)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.79</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Ln triglycerides</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.70 (-32.48, 33.88)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.97</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>12.6 (-24.12, 49.32)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.49</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Ln HDL</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-4.78 (-56.43, 46.88)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.85</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-15.96 (-72.28, 40.37)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.58</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Ln LDL</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.16 (-48.06, 54.39)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.90</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>13.12 (-41.2, 67.45)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.63</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Total/HDL ratio</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-0.67 (-11.57, 10.24)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.90</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.58 (-9.5, 14.68)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.67</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p><sup>a</sup>Annual change in total tibial cartilage volume (in microlitres) for each unit increase in total cholesterol, natural logarithm (Ln) of triglycerides, natural logarithm of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or for the total/HDL ratio after adjusting for age and body mass index. CI, confidence interval.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Discussion</p>
</st>
<p>In this cohort study of asymptomatic middle-aged women, serum lipids were not associated with the presence of BMLs at baseline or change in knee cartilage over 2 years. However, greater levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, even within the normal ranges, were associated with the incidence of BMLs in knees free of BMLs at baseline.</p>
<p>No previous study has examined the relationship between serum lipids and longitudinal change in knee structures or incident OA. There is, however, some evidence suggesting a relationship between increasing cholesterol and knee OA from cross-sectional studies <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Among patients selected based on hospitalisation for joint replacement due to advanced OA, approximately 38% had hypercholesterolemia (serum cholesterol of at least 6.2 mmol/L or on antihyperlipidemic medications) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Among women from the Chingford study, moderately raised serum cholesterol levels (6.0 to 7.1 mmol/L) were associated with the presence of radiological and bilateral knee OA <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In our population of asymptomatic subjects with no clinically knee OA, we found no significant relationship between serum lipids and change in cartilage over 2 years.</p>
<p>In contrast, we found a significant relationship between serum lipids and the development of new BMLs. This finding is supported by the recent findings in a different asymptomatic population that found that dietary lipids were associated with the risk of BMLs <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Whilst total cholesterol and triglycerides were associated with the incidence of BMLs, no relationship was seen with the traditional vascular risk factors of total cholesterol/HDL ratio and LDL. An increased ratio indicates a higher concentration of the more atherogenic LDL compared with the HDL cholesterol and confers an increased cardiovascular risk <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. This may be due in part to the small number of incident BMLs reducing the power of the study to detect weaker associations, as was seen in the demonstrated relationships between incident BML and total cholesterol/HDL ratio, in which a significant univariate trend that was not persistently significant in the multivariate analyses was shown. Although we did not detect any significant associations between lipid levels and prevalent BMLs at baseline, this may be explained by the mixed nature of BMLs. To date, a number of risk factors have been identified for BMLs; one predominant risk factor is malalignment <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Prevalent BMLs are likely to be a diverse group and the result of a number of risk factors, including altered joint biomechanics and trauma as well as other known and unknown factors. Therefore, the ability to identify a risk factor such as serum lipids, independent of other risk factors, may be reduced among those with prevalent BMLs. In contrast, by examining those free of BMLs at baseline in this population of asymptomatic people with no clinical knee disease or symptoms, we were able to detect a relationship between serum lipids and incident BMLs. This longitudinal finding provides a much stronger level of evidence for a relationship between serum lipids and BMLs than can be obtained from a cross-sectional study <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B40">40</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Our data suggest that BMLs are not solely a consequence of biomechanical factors. It is possible that the relationship between lipids and BMLs may be a consequence of vascular pathology. Subchondral bone is highly vascularised and it has been suggested that one origin of BMLs may be ischemia and/or reperfusion injury <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. A study of human bone marrow using gadolinium demonstrated that compared with knees free of BMLs, those with BMLs showed perfusion abnormalities, including significantly reduced venous outflow <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, and BMLs detected on MRI have been said to be similar to those seen in avascular necrosis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Although some previous studies have suggested that hyperlipidemia may occur as a consequence of OA and the associated treatments, the findings of our study suggest that this is not the case but that serum cholesterol and triglycerides are positively associated with structural change in the knee in the absence of OA. Whether elevated lipid levels cause incident BMLs via a vascular mechanism is not known. Alternatively, it may be that the relationship between serum lipids and incidence of BMLs is the result of inflammatory pathways or as yet unknown mechanisms. Given that coagulation and inflammatory pathways have been shown to be intimately related <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B41">41</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, it is possible that the results we have observed are a combination of both effects. Histological studies in both animals and humans have demonstrated lipid, cholesterol and fibrin deposits in cancellous bone <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B41">41</abbr>
<abbr bid="B42">42</abbr>
<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. These lipid emboli and thrombi may result in reduced blood flow and lead to ischemia and ultimately bone necrosis. Furthermore, dogs with hip OA were shown to have increased serum lipid levels as well as evidence of hypofibrinolysis and increased platelet aggregability that could be reversed with treatment, resulting in a significant improvement in OA symptoms <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B41">41</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Thus, it may be that reducing lipids will have a beneficial effect in reducing subsequent knee OA.</p>
<p>Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia are major risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B44">44</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. We have found that subtle perturbations in lipid metabolism are also associated with the development of new BMLs, which are significant predictors of OA development and progression. We did not find a significant association between serum lipids and cartilage change. However, given that BMLs are associated with progression of cartilage defects <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and loss of cartilage <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, it may be that our present study did not have power to show a direct relationship between serum lipids and cartilage loss. Larger studies of longer duration, especially in an asymptomatic population free of clinical OA, may be required.</p>
<p>This study has a number of limitations. First, the power of this study to show an effect was limited by the low number of prevalent (14%) BMLs; therefore, we were unable to examine change in BML size over 2 years. In addition, due to the modest number of subjects who developed a BML, these results will need to be confirmed in larger studies. In this study, we were not able to measure knee alignment and this may have attenuated our findings. However, recent work suggests that the relationship between BML and progression persisted after accounting for alignment <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In addition, due to the low prevalence of smokers in this population, we were unable to examine how smoking may relate to loss of cartilage and incidence of BMLs. We did not obtain radiographs of the knees, so some subjects may have had asymptomatic radiographic OA. However, we used the presence of pain to exclude any potential participants who may have had clinical OA since all of the American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification of knee OA require pain. Individuals with significant knee injury in the past, pain at baseline, knee surgery or physician diagnosis of any type of arthritis were excluded. There is debate as to how to define early knee OA since it is now clear that there is a continuum from the normal to the OA knee, with more than 10% of knee cartilage already lost by the time radiological OA is present <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B46">46</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. A major strength of our findings is that serum lipids were shown to be a risk factor for incident BML among those without any BML at baseline in a population that was asymptomatic with no knee pain, no history of treatment for knee disease and no history of knee injury. This population represents an asymptomatic preclinical OA population within the spectrum of disease development and would be the population in which primary prevention measures would be used. Another potential limitation of our study is that lipids were measured 1.5 to 3.5 years prior to the MRI assessment. However, baseline measurements of lipoprotein lipids and apoproteins have been shown to be robust predictors of cardiovascular events a number of years later <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. We also did not have information on whether women were on lipid-lowering drugs; however, the aim of this study was to examine the relationship between serum lipid levels and BMLs and cartilage. Any woman on treatment would have been classified based on her cholesterol level; therefore, those with a tendency to hypercholesterolemia but whose cholesterol was normal on assessment would have been analysed as having a normal cholesterol level. This is likely to have underestimated the effect we observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusions</p>
</st>
<p>In this study of asymptomatic middle-aged women with no clinical knee OA, cholesterol and triglyceride levels were associated with the incidence of BMLs over 2 years. This provides support for the hypothesis that vascular pathology may have a role in the pathogenesis of knee OA and warrants further work to clarify this and whether treatments aimed at reducing serum lipids may have a role in reducing the burden of knee OA.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abbreviations</p>
</st>
<p>BMI: body mass index; BML: bone marrow lesion; CI: confidence interval; CV: coefficient of variation; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ln: natural logarithm; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; OA: osteoarthritis; OR: odds ratio; SD: standard deviation.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Competing interests</p>
</st>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Authors' contributions</p>
</st>
<p>FH, SRD, SLD and JA were involved in the design and implementation of the study, including data collection and measurement. AEW, RJB and FMC were involved in the design and implementation of the study, including data collection and measurement, and in the analysis and interpretation of the data. MD-T was involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors were involved in the manuscript preparation and read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</bdy><bm>
<ack>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Acknowledgements</p>
</st>
<p>This work was supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) (grants 219279 and 334267). AEW and FH are the recipients of NHMRC Public Health (Australia) Fellowships (317840 and 418961, respectively). We would especially like to thank the study participants, who made this study possible.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>High levels of fat and (n-6) fatty acids in cancellous bone in osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Plumb</snm><fnm>MS</fnm></au><au><snm>Aspden</snm><fnm>RM</fnm></au></aug><source>Lipids Health Dis</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>3</volume><fpage>12</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1476-511X-3-12</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">446208</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">15207011</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Is progressive osteoarthritis an atheromatous vascular disease?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Conaghan</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au><au><snm>Vanharanta</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Dieppe</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann Rheum Dis</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>64</volume><fpage>1539</fpage><lpage>1541</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1136/ard.2005.039263</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1755271</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16107512</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Vascular pathology and osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Findlay</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au></aug><source>Rheumatology (Oxford)</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>46</volume><fpage>1763</fpage><lpage>1768</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/rheumatology/kem191</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17693442</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Clinical comorbidity in patients with osteoarthritis: a case-control study of general practice consulters in England and Wales</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kadam</snm><fnm>UT</fnm></au><au><snm>Jordan</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Croft</snm><fnm>PR</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann Rheum Dis</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>63</volume><fpage>408</fpage><lpage>414</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1136/ard.2003.007526</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1754944</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">15020335</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Prevalance of cardiovascular disease risk factors among US adults with self-reported osteoarthritis: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey</p></title><aug><au><snm>Singh</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Miller</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au><au><snm>Lee</snm><fnm>FH</fnm></au><au><snm>Pettitt</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Russell</snm><fnm>MW</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Manag Care</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>S383</fpage><lpage>S391</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12416788</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Vascular anatomy and microcirculation of skeletal zones vulnerable to osteonecrosis: vascularization of the femoral head</p></title><aug><au><snm>Johnson</snm><fnm>EO</fnm></au><au><snm>Soultanis</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Soucacos</snm><fnm>PN</fnm></au></aug><source>Orthop Clin North Am</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>35</volume><fpage>285</fpage><lpage>291</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ocl.2004.03.002</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15271536</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Degenerative joint disease: cartilage or vascular</p></title><aug><au><snm>Imhof</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Breitenseher</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kainberger</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Trattnig</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Skeletal Radiol</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>26</volume><fpage>398</fpage><lpage>403</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s002560050254</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9259096</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Approaches to study of ischemia in bone</p></title><aug><au><snm>Winet</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Hsieh</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Bao</snm><fnm>JY</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biomed Mater Res</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>43</volume><fpage>410</fpage><lpage>421</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199824)43:4&lt;410::AID-JBM8&gt;3.0.CO;2-B</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9855199</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>How does tibial cartilage volume relate to symptoms in subjects with knee osteoarthritis?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wluka</snm><fnm>AE</fnm></au><au><snm>Wolfe</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Stuckey</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Cicuttini</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann Rheum Dis</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>63</volume><fpage>264</fpage><lpage>268</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1136/ard/2003.007666</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1754924</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">14962960</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Rate of cartilage loss at two years predicts subsequent total knee arthroscopy: a prospective study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cicuttini</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au><au><snm>Jones</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Forbes</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Wluka</snm><fnm>AE</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann Rheum Dis</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>63</volume><fpage>1124</fpage><lpage>1127</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1136/ard.2004.021253</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1755122</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">15115714</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>The role of bone in the development of osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lajeunesse</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Reboul</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Bone and Osteoarthritis</source><publisher>London: Springer</publisher><pubdate>2007</pubdate><fpage>19</fpage><lpage>39</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">full_text</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Bone marrow lesions in the knee are associated with increased local bone density</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lo</snm><fnm>GH</fnm></au><au><snm>Hunter</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>McLennan</snm><fnm>CE</fnm></au><au><snm>LaValley</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au><au><snm>Kiel</snm><fnm>DP</fnm></au><au><snm>McLean</snm><fnm>RR</fnm></au><au><snm>Genant</snm><fnm>HK</fnm></au><au><snm>Guermazi</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Felson</snm><fnm>DT</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>52</volume><fpage>2814</fpage><lpage>2821</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.21290</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16145676</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Magnetic resonance-detected subchondral bone marrow and cartilage defect characteristics associated with pain and x-ray defined knee osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sowers</snm><fnm>MF</fnm></au><au><snm>Hayes</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Jamadar</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Capul</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Lachance</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Jannausch</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>11</volume><fpage>387</fpage><lpage>393</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S1063-4584(03)00080-3</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12801478</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Correlates of knee pain in older adults: Tasmanian older adult cohort study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhai</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Blizzard</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Srikanth</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Ding</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Cooley</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Cicuttini</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au><au><snm>Jones</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>55</volume><fpage>264</fpage><lpage>271</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.21835</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16583417</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>The relationship between specific tissue lesions and pain severity in persons with knee osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Torres</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Dunlop</snm><fnm>DD</fnm></au><au><snm>Peterfy</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Guermazzi</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Prasad</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Hayes</snm><fnm>KW</fnm></au><au><snm>Song</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Cahue</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Chang</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Marshall</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Sharma</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>1033</fpage><lpage>1040</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.joca.2006.03.015</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16713310</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>The association of bone marrow lesions with pain in knee osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Felson</snm><fnm>DT</fnm></au><au><snm>Chaisson</snm><fnm>CE</fnm></au><au><snm>Hill</snm><fnm>CL</fnm></au><au><snm>Totterman</snm><fnm>SM</fnm></au><au><snm>Gale</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au><au><snm>Skinner</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Kazis</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Gale</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann Intern Med</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>134</volume><fpage>541</fpage><lpage>549</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11281736</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Correlation of the development of knee pain with enlarging bone marrow lesion on magnetic resonance imaging</p></title><aug><au><snm>Felson</snm><fnm>DT</fnm></au><au><snm>Niu</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Roemer</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Aliabadi</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Clancy</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Torner</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Lewis</snm><fnm>CE</fnm></au><au><snm>Nevitt</snm><fnm>MC</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>56</volume><fpage>2986</fpage><lpage>2992</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.22851</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17763427</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Bone marrow edema and its relation to progression of knee osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Felson</snm><fnm>DT</fnm></au><au><snm>McLaughlin</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Goggins</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>LaValley</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au><au><snm>Gale</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Totterman</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Hill</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Gale</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann Intern Med</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>139</volume><fpage>330</fpage><lpage>336</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">12965941</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Bone marrow abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging are associated with type II collagen degradation in knee osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Garnero</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Peterfy</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Zaim</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Schoenharting</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>52</volume><fpage>2822</fpage><lpage>2829</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.21366</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16145678</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>MR imaging findings in the follow up of patients with different stages of knee osteoarthritis and the correlation with clinical symptoms</p></title><aug><au><snm>Phan</snm><fnm>CM</fnm></au><au><snm>Link</snm><fnm>TM</fnm></au><au><snm>Blumenkrantz</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Dunn</snm><fnm>TC</fnm></au><au><snm>Ries</snm><fnm>MD</fnm></au><au><snm>Steinbach</snm><fnm>LS</fnm></au><au><snm>Majumdar</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Eur Radiol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>608</fpage><lpage>618</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00330-005-0004-5</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16222533</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Increase in bone marrow lesions associated with cartilage loss: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of knee osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hunter</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Niu</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Goggins</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Amin</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>LaValley</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au><au><snm>Guermazi</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Genant</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Gale</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Felson</snm><fnm>DT</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>54</volume><fpage>1529</fpage><lpage>1535</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.21789</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16646037</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>A study of the prevalence and associations of subchondral bone marrow lesions in the knees of healthy middle-aged women</p></title><aug><au><snm>Guymer</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Baranyay</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Wluka</snm><fnm>AE</fnm></au><au><snm>Hanna</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Bell</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Davis</snm><fnm>SR</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Cicuttini</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au></aug><source>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>15</volume><fpage>1437</fpage><lpage>1442</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.joca.2007.04.010</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17560134</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Association of bone marrow lesions with knee structures and risk factors for bone marrow lesions in the knees of clinically healthy, community-based adults</p></title><aug><au><snm>Baranyay</snm><fnm>FJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Wluka</snm><fnm>AE</fnm></au><au><snm>English</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au><au><snm>Giles</snm><fnm>GG</fnm></au><au><snm>Sullivan</snm><fnm>RO</fnm></au><au><snm>Cicuttini</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au></aug><source>Semin Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>37</volume><fpage>112</fpage><lpage>118</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.semarthrit.2007.01.008</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17391738</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in chronic knee pain: a 2 year follow-up</p></title><aug><au><snm>Boegard</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Rudling</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Petersson</snm><fnm>IF</fnm></au><au><snm>Jonnson</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>473</fpage><lpage>480</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1053/joca.2001.0414</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11467896</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>The association of meniscal pathologic changes with cartilage loss in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hunter</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>YQ</fnm></au><au><snm>Niu</snm><fnm>JB</fnm></au><au><snm>Tu</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Amin</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Clancy</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Guermazi</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Grigorian</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Gale</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Felson</snm><fnm>DT</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>54</volume><fpage>795</fpage><lpage>801</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.21724</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16508930</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Bone marrow edema-like lesions change in volume in the majority of patients with osteoarthritis: associations with clinical features</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kornaat</snm><fnm>PR</fnm></au><au><snm>Kloppenburg</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Sharma</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Botha-Scheepers</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Le Graverand</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au><au><snm>Coene</snm><fnm>LN</fnm></au><au><snm>Bloem</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Watt</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au></aug><source>Eur Radiol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>17</volume><fpage>3073</fpage><lpage>3078</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00330-007-0711-1</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2077908</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">17823802</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>Effect of fatty acids on bone marrow lesions and cartilage in healthy, middle-aged subjects without clinical knee osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Wluka</snm><fnm>AE</fnm></au><au><snm>Hodge</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>English</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au><au><snm>Giles</snm><fnm>GG</fnm></au><au><snm>O&apos;Sullivan</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Cicuttini</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au></aug><source>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>579</fpage><lpage>583</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.joca.2007.09.007</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17937997</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>The natural history of bone marrow lesions in community-based middle-aged women without clinical knee osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Berry</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au><au><snm>Davies-Tuck</snm><fnm>ML</fnm></au><au><snm>Wluka</snm><fnm>AE</fnm></au><au><snm>Hanna</snm><fnm>FS</fnm></au><au><snm>Bell</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Davis</snm><fnm>SR</fnm></au><au><snm>Adams</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Ciccutini</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au></aug><source>Semin Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>39</volume><fpage>213</fpage><lpage>217</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.05.003</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18639319</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>Bone marrow edema pattern in osteoarthritic knees: correlation between MR imaging and histologic findings</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zanetti</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Bruder</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Romero</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Hodler</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Radiology</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>215</volume><fpage>835</fpage><lpage>840</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10831707</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>Perfusion abnormalities in subchondral bone associated with marrow edema, osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Aaron</snm><fnm>RK</fnm></au><au><snm>Dyke</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au><au><snm>Ciombor</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au><au><snm>Ballon</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Lee</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Jung</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Tung</snm><fnm>GA</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann N Y Acad Sci</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>1117</volume><fpage>124</fpage><lpage>137</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1196/annals.1402.069</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18056039</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>Androgen levels in adult females: changes with age, menopause, and oophorectomy</p></title><aug><au><snm>Davison</snm><fnm>SL</fnm></au><au><snm>Bell</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Donath</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Montalto</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au><au><snm>Davis</snm><fnm>SR</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Endocrinol Metab</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>90</volume><fpage>3847</fpage><lpage>3853</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1210/jc.2005-0212</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15827095</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association</p></title><aug><au><snm>Altman</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Asch</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Bloch</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Bole</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Borenstein</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Brandt</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Christy</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Cooke</snm><fnm>TD</fnm></au><au><snm>Greenwald</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Hochberg</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Howell</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Kaplan</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Koopman</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Longley</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Mankin</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>McShane</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Medsger</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Meen</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Mikkelsen</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Moskowsitz</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Murphy</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Rothschild</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Segal</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Sokoloff</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Wolfe</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>1986</pubdate><volume>29</volume><fpage>1039</fpage><lpage>1049</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.1780290816</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">3741515</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>Endogenous androgen levels and cardiovascular risk profile in women across the adult life span</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bell</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Davison</snm><fnm>SL</fnm></au><au><snm>Papalia</snm><fnm>M-A</fnm></au><au><snm>McKenzie</snm><fnm>DP</fnm></au><au><snm>Davis</snm><fnm>SR</fnm></au></aug><source>Menopause</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>630</fpage><lpage>638</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17224854</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without the use of preparative ultracentrifuge</p></title><aug><au><snm>Friedewald</snm><fnm>WT</fnm></au><au><snm>Levy</snm><fnm>RI</fnm></au><au><snm>Fredrickson</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Chem</source><pubdate>1972</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>499</fpage><lpage>502</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">4337382</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B35"><title><p>Magnetic resonance imaging in osteoarthritis of the knee: correlation with radiographic and scintigraphic findings</p></title><aug><au><snm>McAlindon</snm><fnm>TE</fnm></au><au><snm>Watt</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>McCrae</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Goddard</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Dieppe</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann Rheum Dis</source><pubdate>1991</pubdate><volume>50</volume><fpage>14</fpage><lpage>19</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1136/ard.50.1.14</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1004317</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">1994861</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B36"><title><p>The determinants of change in tibial cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wluka</snm><fnm>AE</fnm></au><au><snm>Stuckey</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Snaddon</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Cicuttini</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>46</volume><fpage>2065</fpage><lpage>2072</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.10460</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12209510</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B37"><title><p>Serum cholesterol and osteoarthritis. The Baseline Examination of the Ulm Study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sturmer</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Sun</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Sauerland</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Zeissig</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Gunther</snm><fnm>KP</fnm></au><au><snm>Puhl</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Brenner</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>J Rheumatol</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>1827</fpage><lpage>1832</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">9733467</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B38"><title><p>The relationship of obesity, fat distribution and osteoartritis in women in the general population: the Chingford study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hart</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Spector</snm><fnm>TD</fnm></au></aug><source>J Rheumatol</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>331</fpage><lpage>335</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">8474072</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B39"><title><p>Non-HDL Cholesterol, Apolipoprotiens A-1 and B<sub>100</sub>, standard lipid measures, lipid ratios and CRP as risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ridker</snm><fnm>PM</fnm></au><au><snm>Rifai</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Cook</snm><fnm>NR</fnm></au><au><snm>Bradwin</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Buring</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au></aug><source>JAMA</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>294</volume><fpage>326</fpage><lpage>333</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1001/jama.294.3.326</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16030277</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B40"><aug><au><snm>Rothman</snm><fnm>KJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Greenland</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Lash</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Modern Epidemiology</source><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams Wilkins</publisher><pubdate>2008</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B41"><title><p>Vascular mechanisms in osteoarthritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ghosh</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Cheras</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au></aug><source>Best Pract Clin Rheumatol</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>15</volume><fpage>693</fpage><lpage>709</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1053/berh.2001.0188</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11812016</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B42"><title><p>Fat embolism of bone. A roentgenographic and histological investigation, with use of intra-arterial lipiodol, in rabbits</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jones</snm><fnm>JP</fnm><suf>Jr</suf></au><au><snm>Sakovich</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>J Bone Joint Surg Am</source><pubdate>1966</pubdate><volume>48</volume><fpage>149</fpage><lpage>164</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">4159272</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B43"><title><p>The etiology of steroid-induced avascular necrosis of bone. A laboratory and clinical study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cruess</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Ross</snm><fnm>DL</fnm></au><au><snm>Crawshaw</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Orthop Relat Res</source><pubdate>1975</pubdate><volume>113</volume><fpage>178</fpage><lpage>183</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/00003086-197511000-00028</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">1192666</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B44"><title><p>Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yusuf</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Hawken</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>&#212;unpuu</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Dans</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Avezum</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Lanas</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>McQueen</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Budaj</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Pais</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Varigos</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Lisheng</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><cnm>INTERHEART Study Investigators</cnm></au></aug><source>Lancet</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>364</volume><fpage>937</fpage><lpage>952</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15364185</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B45"><title><p>High sensitivity C-reactive protein is associated with lower tibial cartilage volume but not lower patella cartilage volume in healthy women at midlife</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hanna</snm><fnm>FS</fnm></au><au><snm>Bell</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Cicuttini</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au><au><snm>Davison</snm><fnm>SL</fnm></au><au><snm>Wluka</snm><fnm>AE</fnm></au><au><snm>Davis</snm><fnm>SR</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Res Ther</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>R27</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/ar2380</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2374464</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">18312679</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B46"><title><p>Early radiographic osteoarthritis is associated with substantial changes in cartilage volume and tibial bone surface area in both males and females</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jones</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Ding</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Scott</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Glisson</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Cicuttini</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>169</fpage><lpage>174</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.joca.2003.08.010</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14723876</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B47"><title><p>Blood lipids and first-ever ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Registry: high triglycerides constitute an independent risk factor</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tanne</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Koren-Morag</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Graff</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Goldbourt</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au></aug><source>Circulation</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>104</volume><fpage>2892</fpage><lpage>2897</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1161/hc4901.100384</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11739302</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
</bm></art>
